.d53b12e5.png&w=3840&q=75 "Trivas.ai")
by Trivas.aiWe're cleaning house on the blog. The page at /resources/blog-insights/roi-measurement-and-business-impact is getting pulled from its standalone spot and folded into a bigger resource. This post walks through why, and what happens to the content and the URL.
The numbers made this an easy call. Over the last three months, the page pulled in under 10 impressions and exactly zero clicks. Not a slow month. Three months.
A page like that isn't neutral. It's not just "not helping," it's actively dragging down how search engines read the rest of the site. Thin, underperforming pages contribute to sitewide quality signals, and when you've got a handful of pages bleeding out like this one, it affects crawl priority and trust for everything else you publish.
We also checked the internal link graph. The page has basically no inbound links from other site content, and nothing of value pointing out from it either. No link equity to protect, no orphaned traffic funnel to worry about breaking. That's actually good news: it makes this one of the safer pages on the site to touch without second-guessing the SEO fallout.
Two outcomes make sense here. Either the useful parts of the content get merged into a stronger, more comprehensive pillar page with a 301 redirect pointing the old URL there, or, if there's nothing worth keeping, the page gets noindexed instead. No middle ground where it just sits live, underperforming, indefinitely.
Before redirecting anything, we audited the page line by line. The question: is there a formula, a definition, a benchmark, anything here that isn't already covered better elsewhere on the site?
There's a specific ROI calculation walkthrough on the page worth keeping, along with a short section on attribution windows that's reasonably well written. Those are candidates for folding into a broader guide on ecommerce reporting, as long as they don't just duplicate what's already sitting in existing guides.
Everything else on the page is fairly generic: definitions of "ROI" and "ROAS" that read like they could apply to any industry, a couple of paragraphs that just restate what a dashboard does without saying anything specific. That stuff doesn't need to survive the move. No point carrying dead weight into a new page just because it existed somewhere once.
If the audit had turned up nothing unique, the right move would've been a straight noindex and removal from the sitemap, full stop. Don't force a merge just to avoid admitting a page didn't earn its keep. In this case there's enough salvageable material (the formula walkthrough, mainly) to justify folding it into something bigger rather than scrapping it outright.
The natural home for this content is /resources/guides-reports. It's already positioned as the deeper, more comprehensive resource hub, and ROI measurement fits cleanly as a subsection rather than something that needs its own standalone URL.
This also lines up with how the content should connect to the product. ROI measurement as a topic leads pretty directly into dashboard reporting and forecasting, both of which are things Trivas actually does. A reader who just learned how to calculate marketing ROI is the exact person who should see a link to dashboard reporting or AI-driven insights right after. The old standalone page didn't really connect to anything. The pillar version should.
The search intent behind "roi measurement and business impact" is informational, top-of-funnel. People searching that aren't ready to buy anything, they're trying to understand the concept. That's fine, that's exactly the kind of traffic a resource hub should absorb as one section among several, not the kind of traffic that justifies a dedicated page getting its own crawl budget and internal link slot.
Here's the actual implementation plan, step by step:
/resources/blog-insights/roi-measurement-and-business-impact to the relevant section of /resources/guides-reports. If the CMS supports anchor-level redirects, point it directly at the new subsection rather than the top of the page.None of this is complicated work, but skipping a step (especially the internal link cleanup) is how you end up with redirect chains nobody remembers setting up.
Once the redirect goes live, check it within a few days. Confirm the destination returns a clean 200 status and that there's no redirect chain stacking up behind it. A single clean hop, nothing more.
Then watch the destination pillar for four to eight weeks. Impressions and clicks on /resources/guides-reports shouldn't dip because of this change, they should hold steady or tick up slightly as the consolidated content picks up whatever thin signal the old page had left. If the pillar's numbers drop instead, that's a sign something in the merge or redirect setup went wrong.
Worth rechecking sitewide crawl stats too. Average page depth, thin-content flags, anything that tracks overall site quality. The whole point of pruning a page like this isn't just to tidy up one URL, it's to see a small improvement in how the site reads as a whole.
Last step: log this prune somewhere permanent. A simple record of what got merged, where, and why. Content audits have a habit of rediscovering the same topic gaps months later and spinning up a near-duplicate page. A pruning log stops that from happening twice.
If you want more on how we think about reporting and measurement as the business scales, the resources hub is where we're consolidating that kind of content going forward, or you can subscribe to get new guides as they go up.
explore more insights
3 min read
3 min read
3 min read